Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.
What was decided (18 motions)
16 carried, 2 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.
the City of Greater Sudbury moves to Closed Session to deal with one (1) Solicitor-Client Privilege / Information Supplied in Confidence (Competitive position/negotiations) / Position, Plan or Instructions to be applied to Negotiations item regarding the Kingsway Entertainment District in accordance with the Municipal Act, 2001, par. 239(2), (f), (i) and (k).
Moved by Councillor McCausland, seconded by Councillor Leduc
Carried
the City of Greater Sudbury approves Planning Committee resolutions PL2022-29 to PL2022-31 and PL2022-33 to PL2022-34 from the meeting of March 7, 2022.
Moved by Councillor Kirwan, seconded by Councillor McCausland
Carried
the City of Greater Sudbury approves Consent Agenda items 11.1.1.
Moved by Councillor McCausland, seconded by Councillor Montpellier
Carried
the City of Greater Sudbury adopts Planning Committee meeting minutes of February 7, 2022.
Moved by Councillor McCausland, seconded by Councillor Montpellier
Carried
the City of Greater Sudbury directs staff to approve the negotiated service agreement between Greater Sudbury Hydro Plus Inc. titled “Water Billing and Related Services Agreement” and the negotiated service agreements between Greater Sudbury Hydro, Inc. and the City of Greater Sudbury titled “AMI Equipment and Tower Licence Agreement” and “Radio Spectrum Licence Agreement” to provide required infrastructure and services for the Automated Meter Infrastructure Project as outlined in the report entitled “Advanced Meter Infrastructure (AMI) Update and Approval of Greater Sudbury Utilities Services Agreements”, from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure presented at the City Council meeting on March 22, 2022.
Moved by Councillor Signoretti, seconded by Councillor McCausland
Carried
the City of Greater Sudbury read and pass By-law 2022-47 and By-law 2022-49 to By-law 2022-63.
Moved by Councillor McIntosh, seconded by Councillor Jakubo
Carried
by-law 2022-48 be read and passed. Rules of Procedure A Recorded Vote was held: YEAS: (9) Councillor McCausland, Councillor Kirwan, Councillor Lapierre, Councillor Jakubo, Councillor Sizer, Councillor McIntosh, Councillor Cormier, Councillor Leduc, and Councillor Landry-Altmann NAYS: (2) Councillor Signoretti, and Councillor Montpellier Absent (2) Councillor Vagnini, and Mayor Bigger
Moved by Councillor Montpellier, seconded by Councillor Leduc
Council, by resolution CC2019-198 approved Operations Committee resolutions OP2019-08 to OP2019-10 from the meeting of June 3, 2019; AND WHEREAS resolution OP2019-09, which read "OP2019-09 McCausland/Cormier: THAT the City of Greater Sudbury amends the traffic calming policy by lowering the required minimum response rate to advance a traffic calming project to have a traffic calming plan developed to 25% as outlined in the report entitled “Traffic Calming - 2019 Ranking”, from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Operations Committee meeting on June 3, 2019" was
Moved by Councillor McIntosh, seconded by Councillor Signoretti
Defeated
Amended WHEREAS the Traffic Calming Policy stipulates that in order for a traffic calming plan to be developed, a minimum 50% response rate is required from residents with a minimum 60% support rate of all respondents; AND WHEREAS as part of the 2019 Traffic Calming Update, staff indicated that "since the implementation of the traffic calming policy there have been eight locations that have gone to the public consultation/survey stage to determine if residents support the development or implementation of a traffic calming plan on their street, and that of the eight locations, only two achieved the minimum response and support rate to proceed; AND WHEREAS residents have expressed frustrations with regard to the process to advance traffic calming projects while their concerns regarding speeding on the road continue; AND WHEREAS in the 2022 Traffic Calming Update staff outlined data for 10 municipalities of which 6, namely the Cities of Ottawa, Kingston, Barrie, Brampton, Burlington, and Guelph have no minimum response or support rates; AND WHEREAS although the 6 municipalities noted above do not require minimum response and support rates, they continue to engage residents and other community stakeholders for feedback before finalizing any traffic calming plans; AND WHEREAS City Council wishes to see traffic calming projects advance in accordance with the street ranking without delay; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Greater Sudbury directs staff to present a bylaw to r
Moved by Councillor McIntosh, seconded by Councillor Signoretti As
Carried
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury moves to Closed Session to deal with one (1) Solicitor-Client Privilege / Information Supplied in Confidence (Competitive position/negotiations) / Position, Plan or Instructions to be applied to Negotiations item regarding the Kingsway Entertainment District in accordance with the Municipal Act, 2001, par. 239(2), (f), (i) and (k).
Moved by Councillor McCausland, seconded by Councillor Leduc
Carried
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approves Planning Committee resolutions PL2022-29 to PL2022-31 and PL2022-33 to PL2022-34 from the meeting of March 7, 2022.
Moved by Councillor Kirwan, seconded by Councillor McCausland
Carried
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approves Consent Agenda item 11.1.1.
Moved by Councillor McCausland, seconded by Councillor Montpellier
Carried
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury adopts Planning Committee meeting minutes of February 7, 2022.
Moved by Councillor McCausland, seconded by Councillor Montpellier
Carried
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury directs staff to approve the negotiated service agreement between Greater Sudbury Hydro Plus Inc. titled “Water Billing and Related Services Agreement” and the negotiated service agreements between Greater Sudbury Hydro, Inc. and the City of Greater Sudbury titled “AMI Equipment and Tower Licence Agreement” and “Radio Spectrum Licence Agreement” to provide required infrastructure and services for the Automated Meter Infrastructure Project as outlined in the report entitled “Advanced Meter Infrastructure (AMI) Update and Approval of Greater Sudbury Utilities Services Agreements”, from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure presented at the City Council meeting on March 22, 2022.
Moved by Councillor Signoretti, seconded by Councillor McCausland
Carried
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury read and pass By-law 2022-47 and By-law 2022-49 to By-law 2022-63.
Moved by Councillor McIntosh, seconded by Councillor Jakubo
Carried
THAT by-law 2022-48 be read and passed. Rules of Procedure A
Moved by Councillor Montpellier, seconded by Councillor Leduc
Carried
WHEREAS Council, by resolution CC2019-198 approved Operations Committee resolutions OP2019-08 to OP2019-10 from the meeting of June 3, 2019; AND WHEREAS resolution OP2019-09, which read "OP2019-09 McCausland/Cormier: THAT the City of Greater Sudbury amends the traffic calming policy by lowering the required minimum response rate to advance a traffic calming project to have a traffic calming plan developed to 25% as outlined in the report entitled “Traffic Calming - 2019 Ranking”, from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Operations Committee meeting on June 3, 2019" was
Moved by Councillor McIntosh, seconded by Councillor Signoretti
Defeated
As Amended WHEREAS the Traffic Calming Policy stipulates that in order for a traffic calming plan to be developed, a minimum 50% response rate is required from residents with a minimum 60% support rate of all respondents; AND WHEREAS as part of the 2019 Traffic Calming Update, staff indicated that "since the implementation of the traffic calming policy there have been eight locations that have gone to the public consultation/survey stage to determine if residents support the development or implementation of a traffic calming plan on their street, and that of the eight locations, only two achieved the minimum response and support rate to proceed; AND WHEREAS residents have expressed frustrations with regard to the process to advance traffic calming projects while their concerns regarding speeding on the road continue; AND WHEREAS in the 2022 Traffic Calming Update staff outlined data for 10 municipalities of which 6, namely the Cities of Ottawa, Kingston, Barrie, Brampton, Burlington, and Guelph have no minimum response or support rates; AND WHEREAS although the 6 municipalities noted above do not require minimum response and support rates, they continue to engage residents and other community stakeholders for feedback before finalizing any traffic calming plans; AND WHEREAS City Council wishes to see traffic calming projects advance in accordance with the street ranking without delay; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Greater Sudbury directs staff to present a bylaw t
Moved by Councillor McIntosh, seconded by Councillor Signoretti