The Greater Sudbury Record

Planning Committee Meeting

September 12, 2022

Who was there

Present (2): Landry-Altmann, Leduc

Absent (1): Lapierre

Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.

What was decided (13 motions)

13 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.

the City of Greater Sudbury approves the application by Donald and Julie Rollin to amend Zoning By-law 2010-100Z for the City of Greater Sudbury in order to extend a temporary use permission in the form of a garden suite for a period of three years in accordance with Section 39.1(4) of the Planning Act on those lands described as PIN 73509-0317, Part 2, Plan 53R-19120, Lot 6, Concession 3, Township of Capreol, as outlined in the report entitled “5149 Dupuis Drive, Hanmer”, from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on September 12, 2022. Rules of Procedure A Recorded Vote was held: YEAS: (4): Councillor McCausland, Councillor Leduc, Councillor Landry-Altmann, Councillor Kirwan Absent:(1): Councillor Lapierre
Moved by Councillor Landry-Altmann, seconded by Councillor Leduc
Carried
In favour (4): Councillor McCausland, Councillor Leduc, Councillor Landry-Altmann, Councillor Kirwan
the City of Greater Sudbury approves the application by Chris Lamarche & Ashley Urban to amend Zoning By-law 2010-100Z by changing the zoning classification from “R1-5”, Low Density Residential One to “R3-Special”, Medium Density Residential Special on lands described as PIN 73569-0049 SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1, Parcel 34555 S.E.S., Parts 4 to 6, Plan 53R-14324 in Lot 10, Concession 5, Township of Neelon, as outlined in the report entitled “Falconbridge Road, Sudbury” from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on September 12, 2022, subject to the following conditions: That prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall grant an environmental easement for operational noise and vibration emissions in favour of CN, to be registered on title to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services; That the amending by-law includes the following site-specific provisions: The minimum front yard setback shall be 7.6 metres; The minimum lot depth shall be 42 metres; The minimum depth of a privacy yard shall be 4.5 metres; A minimum of one (1) parking space per dwelling unit shall be required for row dwellings; The following provisions shall apply to required planting strips: All required planting strips shall contain a minimum 1.8 metre-high opaque fence in conjunction with the minimum required landscaped open space area Notwithstanding the above, the width of the required planting strip adjacent to the driveway access
Moved by Councillor Leduc, seconded by Councillor McCausland
Carried
regarding Zoning By-law Amendment: THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approves the application by Vytis Lands (Kagawong) Ltd. & Ronald Jacques Chevrier to amend Zoning By-law 2010-100Z by changing the zoning classification from “FD”, Future Development to “R2-2”, Low Density Residential Two and “R3”, Medium Density Residential on lands described as Part of PINs 73348-0734 & 73348-0005, Parts 1, 2 & 3, Plan 53R-20417 in Lot 2, Concession 2, Township of Balfour, as outlined in the report entitled “Errington Avenue, Chelmsford” from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on September 12, 2022, subject to the following conditions: That the owner provides the Development Approvals Section with a registered survey plan outlining the lands to be rezoned to enable the preparation of an amending zoning by-law; That the draft plan of subdivision be rezoned as follows: Lots 1 to 6, 18 to 21, 92, 93, 164 to 168 and 192 to 194 and Block C be zoned as “R3”, Medium Density Residential; Lots 7 to 17, 22 to 91, 94 to 163 and 169 to 191 and Blocks B and D be zoned as “R2-2”, Low Density Residential Two; and, Block A be zoned as “P”, Park Conditional approval shall lapse on September 27, 2024 unless Condition 1 above has been met or an extension has been granted by Council. Rules of Procedure A Roll Call Vote was held: YEAS: (4) Councillor McCausland, Councillor Kirwan, Councillor Leduc, and Councillor Landry-Altmann Absent (1) Councillor Lap
Moved by Councillor McCausland, seconded by Councillor Landry-Altmann Resolution
Carried
the City of Greater Sudbury approves Consent Agenda item 5.1.1.
Moved by Councillor Landry-Altmann, seconded by Councillor Leduc
Carried
the City of Greater Sudbury’s delegated official be directed to amend the conditions of draft approval for the draft plan of subdivision on lands described as Part of Parcels 15910A, 29828 and 31001 S.W.S., and Part of Lot 1, Plan 53M-1277 in Lots 1 and 2, Concession 2, Township of Balfour, City of Greater Sudbury, File 780-5/94003, as outlined in the report entitled “Laura Drive, Chelmsford” from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on September 12, 2022, as follows: a) By amending the draft plan lapsing date in Condition #14 to November 21, 2023. b) By deleting Condition #24; c) By adding the following sentence to Condition #25: “The geotechnical engineer will be required to address On-site and Excess Soil Management in accordance with O. Reg. 406/1.” d) By deleting Condition #27; e) By adding the following as Condition #38: “That in accordance with Section 59(4) of the Development Charges Act, a notice of agreement shall be registered on title to ensure that persons who first purchase the subdivided land after registration of the plan of subdivision are informed, at the time the land is transferred, of all development charges related to development.” f) By adding the following as Condition #39: “That prior to the signing of the final plan the owner shall satisfy Canada Post with respect to mail delivery facilities for the site.”
Moved by Councillor Landry-Altmann, seconded by Councillor Leduc
Carried
Council passed Resolution CC2015-346 which read, in part, "THAT the City of Greater Sudbury directs staff to incorporate a meandering design of Montrose Avenue to the Maley Drive Extension, such as is illustrated in Appendix "A", into the Transportation Master Plan; AND WHEREAS on December 13th, 2016, Council passed a further resolution which read "THAT the main motion be further amended and that City Staff be directed to prepare a traffic impact study which will: drill down to inform the detailed design and to include new policies in the Official Plan (during the second phase of the Official Plan Review program) to guide the design and construction of Montrose Avenue North as a complete street, and which maintains and protects the residential character of the neighbourhood including appropriate lane widths, identifies traffic calming measures including meandering, sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, street trees and street lighting, and which will encourage local traffic use.” AND WHEREAS in its December 13th, 2021 report to Planning Committee entitled "Phase Two of the Official Plan Review" staff recommended the addition of section 11.2.2.3 Montrose Avenue North which they indicate responds to Council's 2016 resolution, and which read: “11.2.2.3 Montrose Avenue North Schedule 7, Transportation Network illustrates the approximate alignment of Montrose Avenue North. Montrose Avenue North shall be designed and constructed as a complete street which: includes sidewalks and bike
Moved by Councillor Landry-Altmann, seconded by Councillor Kirwan
Carried
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approves the application by Donald and Julie Rollin to amend Zoning By-law 2010-100Z for the City of Greater Sudbury in order to extend a temporary use permission in the form of a garden suite for a period of three years in accordance with Section 39.1(4) of the Planning Act on those lands described as PIN 73509-0317, Part 2, Plan 53R-19120, Lot 6, Concession 3, Township of Capreol, as outlined in the report entitled “5149 Dupuis Drive, Hanmer”, from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on September 12, 2022. Rules of Procedure A
Moved by Councillor Landry-Altmann, seconded by Councillor Leduc
Carried
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approves the application by Chris Lamarche & Ashley Urban to amend Zoning By-law 2010-100Z by changing the zoning classification from “R1-5”, Low Density Residential One to “R3-Special”, Medium Density Residential Special on lands described as PIN 73569-0049 SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1, Parcel 34555 S.E.S., Parts 4 to 6, Plan 53R-14324 in Lot 10, Concession 5, Township of Neelon, as outlined in the report entitled “Falconbridge Road, Sudbury” from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on September 12, 2022, subject to the following conditions: 1. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall grant an environmental easement for operational noise and vibration emissions in favour of CN, to be registered on title to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services; 2. That the amending by-law includes the following site-specific provisions: i. The minimum front yard setback shall be 7.6 metres; ii. The minimum lot depth shall be 42 metres; iii. The minimum depth of a privacy yard shall be 4.5 metres; iv. A minimum of one (1) parking space per dwelling unit shall be required for row dwellings; v. The following provisions shall apply to required planting strips: a. All required planting strips shall contain a minimum 1.8 metre-high opaque fence in conjunction with the minimum required landscaped open space area b. Notwithstanding the above, the width of the required planting st
Moved by Councillor Leduc, seconded by Councillor McCausland
Carried
Resolution regarding Zoning By-law Amendment: THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approves the application by Vytis Lands (Kagawong) Ltd. & Ronald Jacques Chevrier to amend Zoning By-law 2010-100Z by changing the zoning classification from “FD”, Future Development to “R2-2”, Low Density Residential Two and “R3”, Medium Density Residential on lands described as Part of PINs 73348-0734 & 73348-0005, Parts 1, 2 & 3, Plan 53R-20417 in Lot 2, Concession 2, Township of Balfour, as outlined in the report entitled “Errington Avenue, Chelmsford” from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on September 12, 2022, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner provides the Development Approvals Section with a registered survey plan outlining the lands to be rezoned to enable the preparation of an amending zoning by-law; 2. That the draft plan of subdivision be rezoned as follows: i. Lots 1 to 6, 18 to 21, 92, 93, 164 to 168 and 192 to 194 and Block C be zoned as “R3”, Medium Density Residential; ii. Lots 7 to 17, 22 to 91, 94 to 163 and 169 to 191 and Blocks B and D be zoned as “R2-2”, Low Density Residential Two; and, iii. Block A be zoned as “P”, Park 3. Conditional approval shall lapse on September 27, 2024 unless Condition 1 above has been met or an extension has been granted by Council. Rules of Procedure A Roll Call Vote was held: YEAS: (4): Councillor McCausland, Councillor Leduc, Councillor Landry- Altmann, and Councillo
Moved by Councillor McCausland, seconded by Councillor Landry-Altmann
Carried
Resolution regarding Draft Plan of Subdivision Amendment: THAT the City of Greater Sudbury’s delegated official be directed to amend the conditions of draft approval for the draft plan of subdivision on lands described as Part of PINs 73348-0734 & 73348-0005, Parts 1, 2 & 3, Plan 53R-20417 in Lot 2, Concession 2, Township of Balfour, City of Greater Sudbury, File 780-5/12005, as outlined in the report entitled “Errington Avenue, Chelmsford” from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on September 12, 2022, as follows: A. That Condition #1 be deleted and replaced with the following: “1. That this draft approval applies to the draft plan of subdivision of Part of PINs 73348-0005, 73348-0432 & 73348-0579 in Lots 2 & 3, Concession 2, Township of Balfour as shown on a plan of subdivision prepared by Terry Del Bosco, O.L.S., and dated November 28, 2012, as amended by a plan prepared by Terry Del Bosco, O.L.S., and dated July 6, 2022.” B. By deleting Condition #10 and replacing it with the following: “10. That this draft approval shall lapse on December 12, 2025.” C. By deleting Condition #12 and replacing it with the following: “12. The owner shall be required to upgrade Errington Avenue from Street 'F' to Mainville Street, to an urban collector standard complete with a sidewalk along the west side. The owner shall contribute towards the improvement on a per lot basis, with the total amount paid prior to half of the subdivision
Moved by Councillor Leduc, seconded by Councillor McCausland
Carried
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approves Consent Agenda item 5.1.1.
Moved by Councillor Landry-Altmann, seconded by Councillor Leduc
Carried
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury’s delegated official be directed to amend the conditions of draft approval for the draft plan of subdivision on lands described as Part of Parcels 15910A, 29828 and 31001 S.W.S., and Part of Lot 1, Plan 53M-1277 in Lots 1 and 2, Concession 2, Township of Balfour, City of Greater Sudbury, File 780-5/94003, as outlined in the report entitled “Laura Drive, Chelmsford” from the General Manager of Growth and Infrastructure, presented at the Planning Committee meeting on September 12, 2022, as follows: a) By amending the draft plan lapsing date in Condition #14 to November 21, 2023. b) By deleting Condition #24; c) By adding the following sentence to Condition #25: “The geotechnical engineer will be required to address On-site and Excess Soil Management in accordance with O. Reg. 406/1.” d) By deleting Condition #27; e) By adding the following as Condition #38: “That in accordance with Section 59(4) of the Development Charges Act, a notice of agreement shall be registered on title to ensure that persons who first purchase the subdivided land after registration of the plan of subdivision are informed, at the time the land is transferred, of all development charges related to development.” f) By adding the following as Condition #39: “That prior to the signing of the final plan the owner shall satisfy Canada Post with respect to mail delivery facilities for the site.”
Moved by Councillor Landry-Altmann, seconded by Councillor Leduc
Carried
WHEREAS Council passed Resolution CC2015-346 which read, in part, "THAT the City of Greater Sudbury directs staff to incorporate a meandering design of Montrose Avenue to the Maley Drive Extension, such as is illustrated in Appendix "A", into the Transportation Master Plan; AND WHEREAS on December 13th, 2016, Council passed a further resolution which read "THAT the main motion be further amended and that City Staff be directed to prepare a traffic impact study which will: drill down to inform the detailed design and to include new policies in the Official Plan (during the second phase of the Official Plan Review program) to guide the design and construction of Montrose Avenue North as a complete street, and which maintains and protects the residential character of the neighbourhood including appropriate lane widths, identifies traffic calming measures including meandering, sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, street trees and street lighting, and which will encourage local traffic use.” AND WHEREAS in its December 13th, 2021 report to Planning Committee entitled "Phase Two of the Official Plan Review" staff recommended the addition of section 11.2.2.3 Montrose Avenue North which they indicate responds to Council's 2016 resolution, and which read: “11.2.2.3 Montrose Avenue North 1. Schedule 7, Transportation Network illustrates the approximate alignment of Montrose Avenue North. Montrose Avenue North shall be designed and constructed as a complete street which: a. includes sidew
Moved by Councillor Landry-Altmann, seconded by Councillor Kirwan
Carried

The town’s own record

Read the minutes this page was read from →

Where this page and that document disagree, the document is right and this record is wrong. Say so and it will be corrected.